Summer was made for Prosecco

     Oh, she’s a lovely one, that Prosecco!  It is summer and thoughts turn to the warming sun, beautiful women, and a refreshing glass of Prosecco, not its more pretentious distant cousin, champagne.  Prosecco is Italy’s answer to the trivia question, what is a sparkling wine that tastes like sunlight, fresh fruit, looks like sparkles on water, and doesn’t require negotiating a mortgage payment like its French cousin.  That would be – Prosecco.  A wonderful sparkling wine that can be enjoyed without having to graduate from Wine Spectator University, Prosecco comes from the Prosecco region which produces the Prosecco grape.  Okay, that was easy to remember. Clustered in the hills above Venice, the grape is grown on the sunny slopes and achieves its bubbly disposition in a secondary fermentation process that would send shivers down the spine of any discerning Frenchman, not in the bottle like champagne, but in a large steel vat in a process called Charmat.  Sacrebleu Not surprisingly, the vat process is infinitely more efficient and less expensive, resulting in a wine that is, horrors, actually inexpensive for its quality.  Since Prosecco tastes like, well, prosecco, there is little need to overpay for what already is a refreshing experience that immediately brings cool to the hottest day.

     If you insist in uping the ante, there is the Italian equivalent of French obsession, the Italian sparkling wine that uses the champagne process.  This wine is known as Franciacorta, produced in Lombardy from predominantly Chardonnay and Pinot grapes, and in its finest forms, comes close to the better Champagnes.

     But, hey, this is summer made for frivolity, not a toast to the ancients. Champagne lives in that world of the elevated, momentous  occasion and the morning after bubbles hangover.  Prosecco takes its cue from its lively taste, quick finish, minimal bouquet, and gentle fruit consistency. Here today, gone tomorrow, and live for the moment. Now that’s a philosophy that will go nicely with any food group.

Travelling the Past

     Its been over thirty years since I performed the daily grind of of getting up very early and taking the forty minute drive to my high school, but it was a drive I knew like the back of my hand, and could perform in my sleep. Every vista, every building, and every curve in the road from the hundreds of times I took the trip was thoroughly etched in my mind, or so I thought. When I took a little ride into my past a few years ago and tried the drive for old time’s sake, I found myself more than a little confused. In the thirty years that had passed, points of the road had in places not so subtly changed, buildings that were landmarks of the drive were replaced by other buildings, and my mind struggled to agree I was taking the same drive. When I reached my destination of the high school, it looked the same but did not feel the same, because the trip there did not feel as familiar, and the memory seemed somewhat out of place. Thirty years in the stretch of time is an eyeblink, but change affects memory and warps interpretation. When travel extends over hundreds even thousands of years, seeing the memory through the mists of time and the confusing layers of change is a daunting challenge.
     I have found a travel writer that understands this problem and has some wonderful insights to help with both the joy of travel to ancient places and maximizing the experience. In her wonderful travel book, The Road from the Past – Traveling Through History in Franceauthor Ina Caro, wife of Pulitzer prize winning author historian Robert Caro has reworked effectively the problem of recognizing the significance of what you see on a trip. Acknowledging the logistics of most trips revolve around seeing everything there is to see due to the limited time available and the desire not to “miss” anything, Caro suggests a philosophical travel technique to improve your experience and memories of great venues. Ms.Caro looks at history as a wave, and recommends absorbing monuments, views, and venues in a chronologically appropriate historical perspective. Attempting to view the roman ruin, the medieval castle, and modern plaza in the space of the same trip distorts history and confuses the context of each. This beautiful little book focuses primarily on an arc of southern France to Paris, travelling specifically in a chronologically linear fashion, viewing the roman ruins, then the medieval castles, then the royal monuments and never intertwining them.

     Suddenly the layers of confusion start to diminish as the road to the roman theater in Orange is linked to the aqueduct of Pont du Gard and to the Maison Caree’ temple in Nimes, and suddenly the 400 hundred years of Roman civilization and influence in Provence comes alive.

The wave of history then crests to Languedoc to Narbonne where the vestiges of roman citizenship was subsumed by the barbarian Visigoths and to the abbey of Fontfroide and the fortified city of

Carcassonne,  where civilization clung in the dark ages against the marauding vikings. The wave then continues northwest to the valley of the Dordogne and a trip down the river to visualize the opposing castles of the English and French at Beynac and Castlenaud that epitimized the martial and feudal society of the devastating conflict known as the Hundred Years War. And then further north history pushes to the Loire valley where the preminence of royal lines begin to dominate and exploit their vast wealth with magnificient chateaus less for defense then a projection of prestige and power.
Ancient France comes alive under this treatment, and suddenly the clutter of historical layers is swept aside. The human emotions that attend seeing something in its context as did the occupants and travellers saw in that long ago time brings color and magic to ruins and views. The immense power and civilizing influence of the Roman world becomes a visceral sensation. The dark and foreboding fear of barbarian times is brought to perspective in the islands of security in a surrounding wilderness. The commitment of society to eternal war is projected through the martial architecture of every medieval turret. The vast power and overwhelming wealth of the royal line comes alive to the visitor at Chambord who feels the same awe as the commoner who could only look, never touch.
      Ms. Caro’s little book is not a travelogue of places to stay, but rather a guidebook as to how to experience a place. It’s has already made my current morning drive just a little more interesting, and uncommon.

The Last Shuttle

    

      The last planned American space shuttle flight took of from Cape Canaveral yesterday, and with it a fifty year history of continuous effort to achieve and maintain an American manned presence in space. The Space Shuttle program was initiated on April 12th, 1981 and over the next thirty years achieved 135 flights with some significant firsts and some catastrophic failures. Initially positioned as a cheap reusable vehicle for easy space access and material transport, the shuttle proved to be a highly complicated and relatively risky means of space transport. Projecting an original 10 million dollar per flight relative cost and flights as often as once per week, the shuttle program ballooned to costing almost one hundred times as much per flight and was anything but simple to rapidly return to orbit. The catastrophic shuttle failures of 1986 Challenger and 2003 Columbia flights resulting in 14 astronaut deaths and significant delays each time in restoring the program was certainly a major contributor to the waning desire to utilize a complicated glider system for manned flight, but equally as devastating was the progressive loss of identifiable mission value.

     Confined to low earth orbit, the shuttle became an expensive way to deliver a limited number of satellites into space and provide taxi service for the International Space Station, a craft with its own ridiculously expensive albatross of questionable mission value. Spectacular space walks such as the Hubble Telescope rescue missions provided only temporary boosts in interest in the investment required to keep the shuttle viable as the means by which to maintain a permanent space presence..  After thirty years and billions upon billions of dollars in shuttle mission expenditure, the realization of “been there, done that”  with no visible contribution to further space progress has become the epitaph of the space shuttle program.

     NASA’s original plans to retire the shuttle program were predicated on initiating a new vehicle for space exploration, the Orion, but with budgetary issues so dominating the national conversation the program has been scrapped. the best we can hope for is to obtain rented rides on the Russian Soyuz craft until private American efforts such as those being attempted by SpaceX and other companies supplant what has been a national commitment to space and its exploration.  A leader since the beginning in space exploration, America will now take a back seat not only to Russia, but also emerging manned space powers such as China and India.  It is a very unpleasant sign of the times that America must look to others to show the national consensus necessary to do great space engineering, and a poor indicator of this country’s priorities and self confidence.  We seem a long was away from the time when America relished to be in the arena of challenge, sacrifice, and can-do spirit.

We Hold These Truths to be Self-Evident…

     The power of words to move the intransigent, the timid, the pessimistic, and the doubting never reached a higher plane than in the second sentence of a declaration of a people to a king put forth on July 4th, 1776.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

      A revolution had already been underway for the better part of a year when  the leaders of thirteen colonies assembled in a Continental Congress in  Philadelphia to try to determine whether a common consensus could be achieved regarding the American colonies’ relations with Great Britain.  There was no natural consensus.  The New England colonies already under attack by British forces were radical in their intentions to sever all ties and declare nationhood. They were led by firebrands from Boston under the astute leadership of John Adams. The middle colonies of Delaware, Maryland, New York, and the all important Pennsylvania were against draconian steps and saw the actions of the British Parliament to be separate from their loyalty to the King.  The southern colonies varied from watchful waiting from South Carolina to aggressive individual declarations by colonies such as Virginia and North Carolina.  The size and scope of the colonies initially created barriers to a natural confederation and a single voice.

     The number of men prepared to step onto the world stage at this congress however was unparalleled in history. Natural leaders such as Washington and Lee, brilliant minds such as Adams and Jefferson, and sage figures such as Franklin, Livingston, Mason and  Morris.  The recognition of the unique historical nature of the questions they were asking themselves, and the need for unambiguous conclusions dominated every debate.  They impressively could see the enormous potential of a republic lead by common men on the unique stage of the American continent, to put in to practice what philosophers from Greece, Rome, and more recently from the Age of Enlightenment had dreamt about.  These were learned, successful, self made men who additionally recognized that taking on the greatest military power on earth was frought with great danger and personal risk.  As Benjamin Franklin so aptly put to the Congress,  ” Gentlemen, we must hang together, or certainly we shall all hang separately.”

     By mid- June 1776, efforts at conciliatory diplomacy with Great Britain were met with stiff rejection and dire threats from the King and Parliament, and it became apparent to all that a declared statement for history as to the rationale for a complete independence be defined.  It was left to a Committee of Five, formed of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Robert Livingston, and Roger Sherman to draft a declaration.  The actual writing fell to Jefferson, the editing to the others and a draft was available to the congress to debate on June 28th, 1776. The original draft was dramatically sculpted with 25% of the prose removed, including  anti-slavery text accusing the King of “creating” the calamity of slavery removed.  Jefferson was unhappy with the haphazard attack on his carefully crafted words, but the document’s incredible force was preserved in its first two immortal sentences.  The first declaring the natural law entailed in the reasonable conclusion of the need for a complete independence and severance of ties:

“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

      An extended list of grievences then set the foundation for the final paragraph that  stated the intention of thirteen disparate colonies to act as one a form a unique entity,  a unified country of free men self ruled:

  We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

     On July 2nd, the individual colonies were called to roll, and each finally declared its intentions – the initial no votes of South Carolina and Pennsylvania were reversed, Delaware converted its vote from abstention to in favor, andNew York abstained.  With 12 votes yeah and one abstention the declaration of independence was passed, and publicly presented on July4th, 1776.

     History was forever changed by the group of men who formulated and signed the Declaration of Independence.  The elements of the declaration became the foundation of freedom movements the world over, from the French revolution to the revolutions of South America, to the modern inflections in the movements in eastern Europe and the Arab Spring.  The strength lies in those words, All Men are Created Equal, and the recognition that the men who expressed it had no way of knowing if they would ever see its fruition.  It mattered enough to them, and ultimately to us, that regardless of trial or tribulation, the words speak an eternal truth.  Happy Birthday, America.

 

Happy Birthday, America!…and Ramparts of Civilization!

     July 4th is the 235th  birthday of that special experiment in liberty known as the United States of America. Kudos and Huzzahs to this great nation and all she stands for on this special day, of which more is to follow forthwith.  There is a more personal reason to celebrate for me , however, as this is the 1st anniversary of the birth of a small outpost defender of that freedom we hold dear, the first birthday of  Ramparts of Civilization

     Born on the 4th of July, 2010, as a unapologetic defender of the positive contributions and special characteristics that have defined western civilization development over the past 2600 years, Ramparts has tried to bring to light the special components of who we are , and the principles worth fighting for.  In a year of 190 essay posts, encompassing over 130,000 written words, we have tried to focus on the current, the controversial, the uplifting, the memorable, and the obscure.  I hope that if nothing else, Ramparts has allowed the reader a relatively painless and hopefully entertaining reminder of the interesting world around us, and a moment, however brief, of introspection.

      In the past year, Ramparts has reviewed artists such as Gerhartz, Homer, Renoir, and Michelangelo;  followed the harrowing and ultimately triumphant story of the Chilean miner rescue; delved into the flashpoints of battle such as Gettysburg, Battle of Britain, and Midway; returned to light such forgotten heroes  as Charles “the Hammer” Martel, Nikola Tesla, Norman Borlaug, and Christoffa Corumbo;  reminded us of the glories of musical genius found in Glenn Gould, Jacqueline Du’Pre, and Alica De Larrocha; asked us to look closer at civilization’s knights in Friedrich Hayek,  Abraham Lincoln, and Winston Churchill; raised to consciousness defenders of the ramparts such as Mark Steyn, Bernard Lewis, and Daniel Hannan; pounded the critical economic factors of the developing debt crisis slowly strangulating western civilization and noted its impact on the evolving political revolution; and revelled in the beautiful musical creativity of stars such as Sinatra, Richard Rogers, Irving Berlin, and Allison Kraus.  These stories and so many more fill the vast repository of moments and accomplishments that define the western ideal.

     So begins another year of Ramparts of Civilization.  It will I’m sure be an interesting journey;  how can it not?  To those who have come along so far, I hope to see you become more involved in the coming year with your comments, to help me better understand your own view, and what you have liked and not liked about the site.  To the new visitors, welcome aboard,  please enjoy reading and thinking, unsheathe your rhetorical swords, and help join, with your fellow defenders, at the  Ramparts of Civilization.  

Across the Open Field They Came

     It is just after three o’clock in the afternoon on July 3rd, 1863 just outside of the hamlet of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.  You are a member of the the 71st Pennsylvania and note for the first time in over an hour that you can hear yourself think.  You have been burrowed like a badger into the ground just behind a low stone fence at the upper crest of an open field, protecting your eardrums and praying for your life as an onslaught of iron shot and killer shrapnel flew over your head, and exploded with deafening blasts behind you. You raise your head guardedly and stare through the smoke across an open field to a row of trees known as Seminary Ridge, and think you see the glint of a thousand sun splashed diamonds.  It is deadly quiet, and strangely beautiful, in the searing heat. The beauty is ephemeral as the reality sets in and the diamonds coalesce out of the trees into the mid-day light.  You realise the hell you have just lived through holds another painful interlude for you.  Your little corner of the fence is about to be the focal point of a nation’s apocalyptic schism,  in which one image of nationhood will sustain, and one will fail.  You are about to be target of Pickett’s Charge.

     On the other side of the open field just within the cover of the trees of Seminary Ridge, you are a member of the proud army of Virginia.  In woolen garments in a humidity swollen day near 90 degrees you have sweated in the brutal heat in motionless air for over two hours waiting for your time to cross the open field ahead.  You are the forward sword of a direct Virginia line from Lee to Longstreet to Pickett to Armistead to you, the heart of the confederate nation, the home of the great founders like Washington , Madison, and Jefferson, the homeland  stage of the great battles of the civil conflict, Virginia. You look across that open field and in the momentary quiet contemplate how anyone could think one could cross that open field and survive. But you are in the Army of Northern Virginia, and pride and honor come before death.  If they say you go…you go.  You are about to be the living apex of Pickett’s charge.

     The mid afternoon sun blazed across the open field on that day in 1863 as the soldier actors on a horrific stage played a heroic part in the climax of the epic three day struggle known as the battle of Gettysburg.  General Robert E. Lee, commander of the confederate forces had been in continuous attack mode as was his personality, on the Union Army’s right  flank through the town of Gettysburg and against Cemetery Hill, and on its left flank through the Peach Orchard and Little Round Top over the past two days. Now the force of the blow would come to the center,split the Union army, and end the conflict that had already taken so many lives.  General  Lee knew he had to live in a perfect world, as the Union forces had advantages in numbers of forces, armaments, economic power,  and victimhood on its side.  He had against such overwhelming considerations, his brave, loyal ,well trained army of winners.  Beyond the open field lay the stone fence; beyond the stone fence lay Washington DC and the end of the war.  In a perfect world, the flank attack by General Early’s forces on the Union right violently fulminating all morning was to distract and weaken the Union middle.  The stunning artillery barrage of Colonel Alexander’s over one hundred fifty cannon proceeding the charge for two hours of ceaseless explosion was to pummel the Union middle, and coordinated with the Pickett onslaught from the front, General Jeb Stuart’s cavalry was to fragment the backbone of the Union from behind with  a simultaneous attack from the rear.  In a perfect world, the 12000 troops of Longstreet’s army would cross the field, find a shattered and demoralized Union middle and crush now and for all time the Union army capacity and morale, and end the war.  In a perfect world, General Lee could see it all, and believed it could be.

     Out of the trees seen above into the hot mid day sun, 12000 troops paraded out into the open field to decide the destiny of all who believed in the ideal of freedom, as it was conceived by both sides in their own way.

     The perfect world ended with the first step into the sun and reality set in.  The battle will never be described better than in Shelby Foote’s “Stars In Their Courses“.  Like all epics that culminate around a single moment, the somewhat inappropriately named Pickett’s Charge, has the painful romance that belies its horror as always occurs when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.  The 12000 found instead of an incapacitated  Union artillery and decimated infantry, a largely intact and devastatingly coordinated defensive response.  From the left flank came crushing fire from Hay’s Ohio troops collapsing in Pettigrew’s North Carolina  brigades, making it no farther than the fences lining Emmitsburg Road.  The Virginians wheeling to their left across the open 1000 yards of field toward the stone fence, faced first the exploding artillery shells, then the grape shot of Union cannon like a hail storm blistering 20 men at a time, torturing the survivors as they attempted to re-form their lines. As they crossed the field to first the road and then the stone fence, they came into the full force of infantry rifles and their merciless aim.  In the last one hundred yards the march finally became a charge, and briefly in what is known as the “high mark of the confederacy” Armistead’s men managed to scale the wall at the angle and briefly overwhelm the local union troops.  In a melee of fists, bayonets, screams, shots, and curses exhausted men fought for their version of free will and the world hung in the balance.  But only briefly.  Union reinforcements came crashing down on the confederate breech, there were no living southern reinforcements to take advantage, and the breech quickly closed.  The lifelong friends Union General Hancock and Confederate General Armistead were wounded, Armistead mortally.  The door to Washington so briefly open, closed violently on the survivors, and the southern high mark was no more.  Confederate retreat was total and to the taunting, revengeful Union cries of “Fredericksburg, Fredericksburg!”  General Lee seeing the retreat washing around him, rode up to Pickett to marshal his division and prepare for a Union counter attack.  Pickett was said to reply, ” General Lee, I have no division now.”

     If the words were spoken, they told a harrowing truth.  The confederate army of Pickett’s charge sustained over 50% casualties with an estimated 1200 deaths and over 4000 wounded, to the Union’s 1500 estimated casualties.  Longstreet’s army lost all 15 of his regimental commanders, including two Brigadier Generals and six Colonels. The horrendous butcher’s bill of the three day battle was over 50,000 casualties to the participating armies.   The effect on the south of having lost the battle at Gettysburg, coupled the next day with General Grant’s capture of an entire Confederate Army at Vicksburg ended any hope of the Confederate dream of nationhood.   General Lee, who asked for so much more coordination then the technology of the time was capable of giving, recognized what it meant and apologized to the retreating troops, crying out to all who would listen, ” It is all my fault.”

     Across that open field in that simmering day in July in 1863, men trusted their destiny to a loving God, who they hoped would understand their violence and forgive them. They gave willingly their families, their dreams, their far away homes, and their lives for conflicting versions of what it means to be free, and what is required to retain that free will.  It is not for us so distantly removed to judge their reasoning, but instead to stand back in awe, of the compelling force of a man’s need to determine his own free will, and fulfill his destiny on the altar of a principle.  The open field we cross is full of risk and torment, but takes place under the canopy of a forever open sky.

Duelling in Madison Leaves Something to be Desired

    
     We live in a time of great political passion and emotional people regarding the critical issues of our time. But I mean, really people, is THIS the best we can do? Christian Schneider in National Review Online documents the “duel” between recently re-elected Justice David Proesser and his foil on the Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley as tempers arose regarding the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision last week to reject a district judge’s sloppy opinion to hold up the Wisconsin legislature’s pending law on collective bargaining for government employees.

     Putting aside the merits of asking government employees to share some burden in funding their pensions or health insurance and the constitutional issue as to whether the judiciary somehow has veto power over legislative process, the fundamental issue in the duel appears to have been the two justices inconsolable disdain for each other. Now that’s the kind of thing that in the old days would have led to a good ol’ fashioned duel. In this case, however, as is inferred by reports, Justice Bradley is accusing Justice Proesser of putting her in “a choke hold” as she apparently rushed him to physically force him out of her office. Justice Proesser is suggested by other witnesses to have put his hands on her shoulders to repel her as she charged him. The extent of the behavior appears to have been at the level of, “Oh yeah? …So’s yur old man!” The infantile denouement has perfectly captured the character of debate of this spring in the state of Wisconsin over the ‘outrage’ of a state legislature performing their elected and constitutional responsibility of balancing the state budget. The reaction of a segment of the state populous to duly elected officials performing their duty? – that would be sit-downs, threats of violence, massed demonstrations, death threats, legislator out of state flight, and recall elections. God forbid that the legislature or governor seek to improve the state in any other way. All hell is likely to break loose.

     Thankfully we can count on the dignity of judicial tradition to evaluate issues based on their merits in law and in constitutional precedent, and not be swayed by the unstable passions of emotion and political avarice.  Actually that would be..No.  The disease of political tactics, smear campaigns, and power grabs has invaded the judicial class as intensely as it has the political class, and the result is a generation of ill-considered politically stained judicial decisions and a lowest common denominator judges.  We’ve come to a time where Justice is not only blind, but deaf and dumb as well.

     Well., it could be worse. The paddycake shoving match between the Justices pales in comparison to the charged political emotions of the 19th century, when a threat or an insult, or worse yet a pattern of verbal abuse, could get a politician challenged to a duel.  On July 11th, 1804 the third Vice President of the United States Aaron Burr shot and killed the first Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton in a duel on the New Jersey banks of the Hudson within view of New York City.  The two men hated each other but the real gasoline for the duel was Hamilton’s persistent efforts to suppress Mr. Burr’s overarching political ambitions.  Locked in a verbal death match long before the actual firing of the dueling pistols, the two opponents simply could not envision a world where both their political views could be justified. They sought to enforce their will rather than develop their alternative arguments for this nation’s future. 

     I’m not saying that the push and shove silliness that just occurred between a cranky old conservative and witchy liberal intransigent is at that the level of an event that cost us one of our most brilliant founding fathers, Alexander Hamilton.  But the reality is that the dangerous fanning of emotions that rise above civil discourse and legal prudence  can overwhelm and distort any rational debate, and put the opponents on a course of accepting no less than complete triumph, or experiencing inconsolable defeat.

     Alexander Hamilton on the morning of July 11th, 1804, shot first, and into the air, to preserve his dignity, and prove his point of view.  Aaron Burr shot into Alexander Hamilton’s abdomen to preserve his dignity, and to prove the demise of  Alexander Hamilton’s point of view – forever.

     The state of Wisconsin is but a laboratory for the process that will soon envelop of national debate as we try to arrest our exploding fiscal crisis. The emotions of the paddycake duel in Madison are trivial to what this debate nationally will involve.  We best get our emotional acts together or, 19th century may again seem all too real.

People We Should Know #15 – Michele Bachmann


     The Presidential race’s political landscape over the many years we have been having electoral contests has been littered with shooting stars, could’ve beens, should’ve beens, and circus acts. Every interest group has put forward their shining champion, every celebrity driven individual, their moment in the sun. Many potential candidates in these niches don’t pan out before a single vote is taken, and some fall away from the unceasing derision from the main stream media that feels it has an exclusive obligation to perform in vetting whether a candidate has sufficient “gravitas” for the job as President. Many of these candidates don’t deserve more than a brief moment in the sun. But as most of us who have generally lost faith in the “objective” review provided by the main stream media, two niches of conservatism have been especially derided, the “black conservative” and the “female conservative”. The paint used to color their participation in the process of debate as to the future of this country by the media uniformly places them as “fringe”, “radical”, “uninformed”, or the old standby “dumb”. These shadyingly racist and sexist adjectives are used by a liberal mindset that lauds itself on being above all such prejudicial rationalizations to denigrate legitimate candidates that may present a threat to their view of the world. Coming to mind is the descriptive assault used on Alan Keyes, Barrack Obama’s African American opponent in the 2006 Illinois Senate race and later Presidential candidate, and more recently, and scathingly, Alaskan governor and Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

     A new “female conservative” has entered the fray, and this one may prove not so easy to undermine.  Michele Bachmann,  U.S. Representative from Minnesota’s 6th District,  presents and entirely new challenge to the liberal paintbrush as an accomplished, highly educated, articulate, savvy, and hard as nails campaigner that just might have the staying power to upset the establishment apple cart and get us to all re-think what “female conservative” is all about.  That is why Michele Bachmann is Ramparts People We Should Know – #15.

     Matthew Continetti in the Weekly Standard provides us with an in-depth introduction to Michele Bachmann in his article, Queen of the Tea Party”.. He underscores Ms. Bachmann’s classic American roots, uplifting story of her life, and sources of her innate activism. The overriding theme of this individual’s life that presents time and time again is Ms. Bachmann’s genetic drive to lead. On almost any front of her life where she saw the need for people to step forward and make a difference she has made the personal sacrifice to put herself forward and get the job done. Her start in politics is legendary as a neighborhood mother that stepped to the podium at a political event to define freedom, and ending up being nominated over the candidate whose nomination the political forum was positioned to rubber stamp. She is of particular attractiveness to Tea Party activists who identify with her stance as an unbending principled conservative in the face of a Washington elite class that has always rewarded ‘knowing your place” and vanilla conservatism. She is an evangelical Christian that holds and unbreakable support for Israel, a country she spent time at a kibbutz in her teenage years. She is impassioned advocate of traditional educational norms, coming into her own in overthrowing Minnesota’s establishment lerch to “non-judgemental” education and collapse of the building blocks of analytic and critical thinking denied the modern primary and secondary education student. She is a strict fiscal disciplinarian in a Washington culture that has come completely off the fiscal rails and threatens the very economic lifeblood of the United States. Most significantly, she is well read, articulate debater who functions extremely well without a teleprompter and is capable of engaging her audience, rather than turning it off.
It is difficult to say whether Michele Bachmann has yet sufficient experience or staying power to take on what is ahead of her in the coming electoral battles. It is yet unclear whether the populist stance she has taken fits the country’s mindset as to what a chief executive should be. What is progressively encouraging for America and health of all our debates on our increasingly difficult problems, is that a generation of talented and decidedly conservative female and minority candidates are coming forward to the debate, and taking on the prejudice of liberal bias. Our problems are best addressed when the consideration of a liberal or conservative philosophy as best suited to address our country’s challenges is predicated on the strength of the argument, and not the superficial cloak used to obscure the leader inside. The revolution to come is not one of policy, but inevitably in the tradition of this country, within ourselves.

A Musical Sun enters the Twilight

    The musical world is used to tragic loss associated with the inherent instability associated with creative artistic life.  The early deaths of John Lennon, Buddy Holly, Otis Redding, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, George Harrison, and Jim Croce among many others came suddenly and offered little time to absorb the effects of such loss on the musical universe.  There is, however, another kind of tragic loss that is upon us, and this time we will have a significant amount of time to experience the dying of the light.  Glen Campbell, a musical force for nearly 50 years, has announced that he has progressive Alzheimer’s disease.   A we have come to experience with other public figures such as former President Reagan and actor Charlton Heston,  Glen Campbell will slowly be taken from us, and we from him, until neither is recognizable, and the greatness of this most musical of talents will be just a ghostly shadow long before he leaves this “mortal coil”.

     Glen Campbell’s greatness may be somewhat under appreciated by the general musical public, but certainly not by music lovers or playing professionals.  Glen has such talent that no single venue has ever seemed to fully represent his abilities, and the breadth of his creative expressions truly awesome.  Glen Campbell was the ultimate session musician when performers often relied on such musicians to maximize their sound. His guitar prowess was legendary from the moment this Arkansan came to Los Angeles to make his mark. He brought virtuoso performance to instrumental albums, and was a critical part of the special sound that was Phil Spector’s Wall of Sound and the the Beach Boys at the height of their popularity.  Then a sideline talent was identified, Glen’s ability to sing, and suddenly the studio artist became a mega star in the late 1960’s with such songs as Gentle on My Mind, Wichita Lineman, and By The Time I Get To Phoenix.  Suddenly, Glen was an extremely hot entertainment act, and nothing seemed beyond his reach.  He brought country music to prominence as a leading TV star on the Glen Campbell Goodtime Show, and a movie star with his role opposite John Wayne in True Grit.  He showed himself to be the best musical interpreter of America’s best songwriter of the time, Jimmy Webb, and a recording star fully versatile in country music, pop, and gospel.  Everybody wanted to sing duets with Glen, and everybody lived in awe of his guitar virtuosity.  Through 1980, there was no entertainment venue that Glen Campbell was not a dominant contributor.

     Like all supernovas, the brilliant light that had shone on Glen Campbell’s career for 20 years, was dimmed by personal demons.  In the case of Campbell, the demon was the old standby alcohol, which warped the family life and relationships of this religious man, skewered his choice of songs and musical opportunities, and brought his run of number #1 hits to an end.  Through all the dark years and personal struggles, his spectacular musical talent remained recognizable whenever he was asked to pick up his guitar and play.  Cleaned up and sober, Glen Campbell over the last 15 years experienced a reunion with his audience and a renaissance with his performing career.

     Now he faces the most difficult of times when the skills and talent he has taken for granted will slowly crumble like the monuments to greatness of past civilizations.  He will likely leave us with a few more gems, but the body of work he has already created is vast and available for all to see on the Internet.  The sadness we will feel as he drifts away from us towards the setting sun, will be balanced by the remarkable bright light of every musical moment he has given us to savor.  Whether it is the young baby faced version, or the later chastened more introspective one, Glen Campbell is a unique reflection of how deep talent goes, and how wonderful it glows, in those who truly have The Gift.