The Nasty Politics of Tragedy

In Tucson, Arizona yesterday, a wanton violent outburst from a depraved individual shattered the calm of a beautiful desert morning. Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was taking part in a “meet your congresswoman” event at a local supermarket when a gunman suddenly opened fire, wounding as many as twenty people, killing six including a federal judge, and critically wounding Ms. Giffords.The motive is unclear, as would be expected with entirely senseless violence.  Over time I am sure we will find the typically convoluted thinking process of a sociopath, who finding he does not fit in anywhere in society, strikes out randomly at those who do.  The deterioration from disturbed, harbored thoughts to violent actions is unfortunately all too common and  nothing new.  From Lee Harvey Oswald to Timothy McVey to this current assailant, Jared Loughner, the perceived wrongs endured, regardless of how ludicrous, explode into a horrific moment of rage, and the loss of life of innocents.  Try as all might to attach an underlying pattern of influences to the madness, there is never any legitimate philosophic structure that ties the slights to the event, as they are fundamentally random outbursts and the human target incidental.   

     Ohhh, but how they try.  Within days of the 1995 Oklahoma City tragedy, President Clinton tied the extremist perpetrator committing the murder of the 168 innocents in the Murrah Federal Building bombing directly to the influence of “right wing” radio :    

“We hear so many loud and angry voices in America today whose sole goal seems to be to try to keep some people as paranoid as possible and the rest of us all torn up and upset with each other. They spread hate. They leave the impression that, by their very words, that violence is acceptable.”
     
      The political advantage was obvious. The random crime is heinous and irrational.  Your political enemies are heinous and irrational. Tie your political enemies to the random crime, and those looking for any connection will have their paranoias confirmed.  President Clinton’s action was premeditated, unfair, baseless, corrupt – and effective.   The success President Clinton achieved in recklessly melding the real victim status with those killed or injured in the bombing with his own “victimhood” was classic Clinton, and proved a powerful weapon against those who would disagree with him.  Disagree with President Clinton , and you were supporting the thinking process of those who would bomb buildings. Absurd on its face but by making the connection the President became just another victim of the bombing.
  
     The hyenas are out again with the tragedy in Tucson.  Knowing nothing of the circumstances of Loughner’s random active, political elements were quick to try to attach blame to the Tea Party, Sara Palin, or any other political opponent to whom the thinnest thread could be connected to Congresswoman Giffords and the massacre.  It is a foul reflex that has developed in political discourse, and thankfully some more credible reporters such as Howard Kurtz see through it for its callousness.  
 
      I am reminded that President Bush despite multiple vicious attacks by political opponents never permitted the connection to be made of the attackers’ verbiage and an accusation of lack of patriotism.  Despite the direct connection of the 9/11 participants to Islamic extremism, he never permitted the connection of extremists to the practice of the religion itself.  I used to think he was allowing himself to be a punching bag.  Sometimes it is just difficult at first to see how individuals with class react to classless attacks.  I am beginning to miss President Bush more and more every day.
 
      Ms. Giffords and all the victims are in our prayers.  Maybe the chattering self absorbed idiots looking for some advantage from the madness can take a moment to think about a family’s pain, and not their worthless agendas.

   

  

  

   
 
 

 

The Miracle of A Free Society

     Every once in a while a human interest story so powerful, so random, so inspiring comes across our society’s consciousness and we must take a moment to revel in the sheer magnificence of it all.   Hot Air made me aware of a terrific story of a man full of hope after a life of hopelessness, who through a single random exposure on a video in an event only possible in a free society with free flow of information, has achieved a life resurrection.  A homeless man named Ted Williams, one of the many who haunt traffic intersections begging for money for food or their own darker natures, decided to be entrepreneurial and sell his only asset, a voice of perfect timbre and projection.  A passerby decided to film the moment and released it on You Tube.  Within hours, the video had touched thousands, and within days, literally millions.   Mr. Williams had led a life of human despair torn by drugs and alcohol, loneliness and homelessness, driven by his own self destructive demons.  As he tells the story, he two and half years ago had a religious epiphany, and stopped his destruction, sobered up and decided to try to pull himself up with his only residual possession, his trained voice, developed years before prior to his crash from stability.

      How many times we pass such individuals and wonder of their story and determine there is nothing we can do to help.  It turns out the best help is simply to take the time to recognized the humanness of each individual and the singular miracle that each life potentially holds.  Watch both videos, courtesy of Hot Air; watch them in their entirety and prepare to be humbled, and elevated.  The magnificience of a free people is that without the help of a “program” or a “grant” or a “pathway” a simple request for a second chance has brought an avalanche of chances and potentially a story for the ages.

2011 – The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

     The entry into the new year of 2011 brings the same set of challenges that every year brings.  The primary emotion is always the sense of renewal, that the worst of the old year’s mistakes can be averted, and new ideas can flourish that will bring a general betterment for all.  That’s the way it’s supposed to go anyway.    2011 opens the new decade, the “tens”, and hopefully this will be a decade of more realistic assumptions, more crisp and insightful analysis, and more determination to preserve the gains mankind has made in making the world a generally more comfortable and individually conscious world than it was for our ancestors. We can only hope.  The first decade of the new millennia was framed by two dark, backward looking medieval philosophies.  The first islamofascism, predicated on forcing the world to accept the edictual interpretations of a 13oo year old concept that women shield themselves from societal interaction, religious diversity be banned, individual expression and freedom be reduced to dust, and death be the revered expression of individual sacrifice. The second, global warming fascism, borne on the individual as the perceived medieval sinner, wantonly improving his own personal comfort at the expense of “others”, based on misrepresentations and pseudo-science, and proselytizing against the future “hell” unless the environmental sins are addressed with severe reductions of personal freedom to achieve, travel, and create.  Both philosophies are shown to be empty and wanting when exposed to any critical scrutiny, and hopefully will be dispatched to the dustbin of history by a more self aware and watching world in this coming decade.  With 2011 comes almost immediate framing of what we as defenders of civilization must keep in focus, and we must be attentive on the ramparts.

     THE GOOD 

      On the first day of the 112th Congress of the United States of America, the defining principles of what it means to have a participatory democracy will finally again be p;laced in the position of prominence it desires.  Word to word, line by line, the Constitution of the United States will be read into the congressional record.  For too long the elements of what makes this democracy unique, the precise rights of the individual and  the precise role and responsibility of the state,  have been subverted by those that feel that principles and rationalizations are interchangeable.  It doesn’t mean that this congress will be different than any other in following through, but there is an inkling of hope that the strong reaction of the citizenry with the most recent national election to restore principled leadership will not be wasted.

     THE BAD

      The overwhelming burden of what is to come may not yet have sunk in yet to the general population.  Multiple states are teetering on the brink of default. State and federal government budgets predicated on the the progressive enriching of the government employee have maxed out, and it is unclear the reaction that is bound to occur with unions when the harsh realities that the “permanent” gravy train may have reached its zenith and is rolling backward.  In Europe this was the stimulus for riots and strikes.  The United States is certainly not immune and there is bound to be friction.  The malfeasance of government to ignore its fiscal responsibilities to support a special interest that guarantees its return to power in return for votes is a dangerous, anti-democratic trend that needs to be stopped now, however painful, to make the future viable for all.    (Graph courtesy of C. Houghton)

     THE UGLY

     The world elite continue to have a love affair with the most reactionary, freedom destructive leaders and this western personality flaw shows no signs of abating.  The lack of outrage and continued pandering to pathetic authoritarians like Fidel Castro in Cuba, Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe,  and Kim Jong Il in North Korea despite their catastrophic policies that have left their countries collapsed and starving remains a ugly sore on civilized clarity in action.  A frank romance with Marxist ends of less individual freedom, expression, and capacities remain a bizarre cultish yearning by those western elites who can’t stand the fact that prosperity has been shared with an ever larger slice of humanity without the reins of control they have always dreamed about.  Ugly. Ugly. Ugly.  If this decade gets anything cleaned up, it would be nice to see the end of rewarding the worst of us with our continued blind eye to their self aggrandizing and delusion.

Bright Idea

     In 1879, Thomas Edison managed to do something that man had yearned for since the dawn of age. Submitting a patent for a light device known as the incandescent bulb, he managed provide for the first time reliable and safe illumination of the dark. There is probably no single idea that has done as more for man’s progress than the light bulb, providing an expansion in commerce, safety, transportation, education, and productive activity to dark rooms and night hours. The idea of carbonizing a bamboo strand, later replaced with tungsten, passing an electric current across it in a vacuum environment created luminescent magnificence that initially lasted for scores of hours, and later, thousands of hours. The invention has provided cheap, reliable, indispensable illumination to the farthest reaches of earth and has changed everybody’s lives for the better.
    

     So in true modern societal fashion, do we venerate such a magnificent outpouring of the best civilization has to offer universally to mankind? Of course not. We get rid of it for a pathetic shadow of an alternative, the CFL, or Compact Florescence Lamp. In 2007, in his one of many moments of catering to irrationality, President George W. Bush signed the Energy Independence and Security Act, effectively outlawing the incandescent light bulb in 2012. This act of Congress, like most oxymoronic acts coming out of Congress these days, determined that the energy expenditures of the incandescent bulb were excessive when compared to the swirly CFL bulb. The fact that the CFL took longer to reach illumination, painted everything an eye straining dull white yellow, and contained a disposal problem of toxic mercury when broken or thrown away entered into none of our elite leader’s consciousness. The point, excepting the fine one on the top of their heads, was single minded. The incandescent bulb illumination was provided by a greater per bulb draw of energy by that satanic force of nature known as the the evil carbon molecule, and therefore could no longer be tolerated.

      Here’s a bright idea. How about simply encouraging the use of more efficient incandescent bulbs and TURN THEM OFF when you’re not needing them? The world reels at the clarity of the logic.

     We have one year to horde our light bulbs or face a more dangerous, more poorly illuminated future. The other alternative is to get hold of your congressman or congresswoman and shake them until they wake up, and repeal this heinous act. Come on people; lets not let stupid rule and make the prohibition of Edison’s genius go the way of other brilliant prohibitions enacted by other Congresses stimulated by their desire to enforce the unenforceable.

     Defenders of the Ramparts, all hail the Bulb!

 

The Voice

     We know it immediately when we hear it- the unique expressive voice that was Luciano Pavarotti’s.  It is telling that we miss it so much, now that it is three years since Pavarotti passed from the earth’s stage to take on perhaps more demanding celestial roles.   There are many fine singers, but few created such a guttural emotion when you heard the man at his best.  The voice was a crystal bell, a high timbred but melodious ring that seemed forever youthful and idealistic, in the wake of so many other more adult and more musically polished interpreters.  There was a sense of yearning, of hopefulness, of such choir like beauty that he frequently brought the most hardened audiences to tears.  It was an extended love affair Pavarotti had with his audience that let them overcome his many perceived slights of cancelled concerts and sudden colds. The  critics did not always understand, but the listener knew that Pavarotti’s gift was a very fragile one, and he wasn’t able to fake the effect on a bad night.  They forgave him, and always came back for more.

     Pavarotti owned the solo aria of Italian opera for twenty years, and made many signature recordings that secured his position as one of the great tenors of the twentieth century.  The Italian operatic arias of Puccini and Donzetti were tailor made for him, emotional, theatrical, and deeply founded on the structure of the Italian folksong.  He didn’t create the high C, but was able to spring it forward like a church bell in the valley, that all recognized as the way the note should be heard.  He not only sounded the part of a great Italian tenor but he looked the part, with his pocket watch and massive handkerchief as props that highlighted his massive smile and equally generous rotundity.  He wrapped the theatrical singing with an Italian accent that was crisp as his notes were bell-like, not one ounce forced, but rather, recognizable as what sung Italian diction should sound like- the unmistakable echoes of his hometown of Modena, Italy.

     In his later years, like all faced with the inevitable ravages of age, the live performances were weaker in quality and content, but his personality often brought people back time and again to hear the memorable shadows of his former magnificence.  And magnificent it was at his height of performing power, the early to mid-1980’s, when a mid-forties Pavarotti in his prime presented us with such sublime creations of primordial force and depth of feeling that is the human voice:

Will Healthcare “Reform” Make U.S. Sick?

     The debate last spring regarding American healthcare was truncated and revolved around lack of access not provision of answers to our pressing healthcare needs. In typical modern legislative fashion, years of carefully wrought considerations regarding the strengths and weakness of the healthcare process were swept “under the rug” in the political rush to claim the moral high ground and achieve “reform”.  As Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel put so succinctly, ” You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”  As is true with so many government decreed “reforms” , the plan passed preserved the worst mechanisms of the previous system, exposing them to an ever larger population, and from a financial standpoint assured a progressive collapse of the segments of the system that are currently working to pay for  those that are progressively not.

     The modern American healthcare system has evolved into 17% of the GDP of the United States and has for sometime threatened to absorb the available discretionary income of the United States economy, suppressing growth and prosperity.  With the recent election, a real debate is finally feasible as the mechanisms of financing “reform” may be carefully reviewed at length.  The challenge of Obamacare was not to solve coverage for all Americans, which it failed to do despite the greatly increased expense, but rather, to assure viability of access to all who wanted it at a price we can all afford.  The passage of the bill only started the debate and its about to get interesting.  Over the next months, the various aspects of financing such an undisciplined reform will come to light in hearings of the House of Representatives, and the discussion to “Repeal” or “Repair” will be the focus of our newly found interest, as expressed in the recent election, in the democratic process.

     Nobel Prize winning University of Chicago economist Gary Becker begins to frame the argument:

The Poetry of the Christ Birth

     The Holy Bible is many things.  A tome of the miraculous relationship of a Supreme Being with His creation.  A device to fashion a life of good acts and deeds.  A missal for introspective prayer.  A means for restoring the balance of a man’s life experience with his needs.

      It is also, however, a great work of literature filled with sublime poetry.  There is no greater example of this then the Gospel’s description of the Christ Birth, filled with the most intense visual ques, profound allegories, and overarching spiritual beauty.  We only need to read a few phrases to immediately attach ourselves to the intimate scene and our eternal connection to the Christmas story and all of its inherent meaning and reflected glory.   In this Christmas season of 2010, take a few minutes again to absorb the beautiful words, craft, and meaning, of the greatest story ever told:

Luke 2: 1-20

“And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.  And all went to be taxed, everyone into his own city.   And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem (because he was of the house and lineage of David) to be taxed with Mary, his espoused wife, being great with child.”

“And so it was that, while they were there,  the days were accomplished so that she should be delivered.  And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn. “

” And there were in that same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.  And lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone about them: and they were sore afraid.  And the angel said unto them, fear not: for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.  For unto you is borne this day in the city of David a Saviour,  which is Christ the Lord.  And this shall be a sign unto you;  ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes,  lying in a manger.”

” And suddenly,  there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying ‘ Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will towards men.’  And it came to pass,as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, let us go now even unto Bethlehem, and see this thing which has come to pass,  which the Lord hath made known to us.”

” And they came with haste,  and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby lying in a manger.  And when they had seen it,  they made known abroad the saying which was told to them concerning this child.   And all that they heard it wondered at those things which were told by the shepherds.  But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart.  And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had seen and heard, as it was told unto them.”

 

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

The Christmas Miracle at Trenton

   It is one of the truly amazing aspects of history that epic historical tides can irreversibly develop from the simplest, seemingly obscure,  and  remote events.   It is one of those events framed around the Christmas holiday, the American raid on Trenton December 25-26,1776, that can easily be declared as epic by any measure.  It is easy to infer that without the morning battle of December 26th,  the American Revolution would likely have collapsed, and history of the North American continent and therefore the world, would have been dramatically different.  From such fragile roots, was borne the United States of America.

    The stage leading to the events at Trenton , New Jersey, was one of almost continuous calamity for the American cause.  Early victories in Boston  had been quickly adjusted to by the British government, who had no intention of letting its prize American possessions slide away into the hands of “rabble”.  A massive expeditionary force of almost 35000 soldiers and half the British navy had been loosed upon the American continent and had crushed the American army earlier in the year in the battle for New York, the shattered remnants of the Continental American army barely escaping into New Jersey. Vigorous pursuit left the army in tatters in Pennsylvania, felt by the British to be impotent in any capacity to do further harm.   With winter approaching, General Howe, leader of the British forces saw little harm in remaining in civilized comfort in New York City, while he planned out the final offensive for next spring to trans-continentally crush the American revolt.  He felt confident enough to allow his second, General Cornwallis to leave the front lines and return to England for the winter, leaving the front in the hands of mercenary Hessian and light British forces facing across the Delaware River whatever faint outlines of an American army remained.  The British owned the towns, the roads, the supplies, and the momentum.  The Americans owned the cold.

     The American position was so perilous it is difficult to this day to conceptualize a way out from the impending disaster. The Continental army had contracted from 30,000 soldiers from the heady days after Bunker Hill to less than 3000 poorly fed, poorly clothed troops stuck in the cold wastes of the Pennsylvania winter.  The near total collapse of the army in the New York battle had left a dangerous schism in the opinion as to who was best served to lead the American army, General George Washington or General Charles Lee, the second in command to Washington and the only American leader with “European” experience.  Lee was perfectly willing to see Washington to whither on the vine, but fortuitously managed to get himself captured a few weeks before Christmas, and his residual troops were herded toward Washington.  The American governmental congress was without money and without allies, but additionally unwilling to provide Washington with the necessary support for extended enlistments of state militias or adequate supplies, and certainly no pay for the troops.  On December 31, 1776, the majority of the troops in the army were reaching the end of their enlistment and were going to go home for good. Washington himself though committed to the cause to the death, privately admitted in correspondence to his brother John Augustine , “I think the Game is pretty near up.”

     It is at such moments that sometimes desperation proves the mother of inspiration.  Washington, seeing no other choice to effect a change in direction and morale for the cause, decided to risk everything against the fortified British in New Jersey.  With a win, however unlikely, he might be able to stimulate a positive commitment from the moribund American nation; with a loss…it simply wouldn’t matter anymore.  He did what homework he could through a meticulous network of spies he had marshaled to report on British forward positions in New Jersey and determined to attack the fortified Hessian regiment at Trenton.  As he lay across the Delaware River, he would have to fashion a perlious amphibious transition of his entire army across the river, march them ten miles in the dead of night, and sustain complete surprise among the well trained and better armed Hessian troops. He would then have to accomplish a successful withdrawal with the captured supplies before superior British re-inforcements arrived.  No one gave him a chance, and no one could imagine a successful outcome.

     Washington however was a leader like no other and the perfect embodiment of the American character.  His password to his troops that night, “Victory or Death”.  In flatboats, fighting a winter snowstorm across swirling, ice choked river water, he oversaw countless transfers of men, horses, and artillery pieces in a logistics masterpiece, and never wavered, never tired, instilling a marshal spirit in previously despondent men.  He marched them to Trenton, and catching the Hessian commander Johann Rall completely by surprise, achieved a complete rout, capturing the 1500 man garrison, its supplies, and losing only two of his own men.

     Out of such moments, and with the additional victory against British regulars a week later at Princeton, Washington had completely changed the dynamic of the war.  The British, who had assumed American collapse was just around the corner, suddenly had to re-trench for an extended conflict.  The Americans, who were preparing to give up on their dilapidated army and Quixote like cause, suddenly had a reason to believe again.  General Washington had managed to invent the unique cornerstone of the American character known as American Exceptionalism, a trait we argue to this day.  Like the true father of the country, he saw the potential for indomitable greatness, before any of his”children” could see it in themselves.  Now that has all the makings of a true Christmas miracle.

Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas

     The wonderful 1944 musical Meet Me In St Louis directed by Vincente Minelli contains one of the most treasured Christmas songs ever written.  Performed by Judy Garland at the height of her artistic powers, sung to the emotionally distraught child actress Margaret O’Brien, the song and setting resulted in one of the most poignant and memorable moments in cinematic history.  The song never fails to capture for me the interwoven connection of the American public to this holiday through song, and the recognition of so many great song writers of the 20th century of this unique connection of the holiday to the American experience. 

     Written by Hugh Martin and Ralph Blane for the musical, the song frames the need for Judy Garland’s character Esther to try to explain to her little sister Tootie, played by O’Brien that a planned move from St. Louis to New York by the family will somehow turnout alright, though neither sister really believes it.  the lyricist Martin conveyed the impact of uprooting the family through the lyrics in desperate fashion:

No good times like the olden days, happy golden days of yore;  faithful friends that were dear to us, will be near to us no more”

“But at least we will all be together, if the Fates allow;  From now on we’ll have to muddle through somehow

     The lyrics painted such a dark sheen on the moment that Martin was asked by Garland to restore some hope to the lyrics, or she was not sure she could get through the song without both she and O’Brien collapsing in tears.  Martin did make an attempt particularly in the first lines, as :

Have yourself a merry little Christmas, it may be your last. Next year we may all be living in the past”  became  “Have yourself a merry little Christmas, let your heart be light. Next year all our troubles will be out of sight”  – a significant emotional reliever.

     The song in the emotional setting of World War II with so many separated and disrupted families was an immediate sensation both nationally and with the far flung troops.  The spectacular singing performance of Garland and the tears of her co-star O’Brien seemed to tear at the fragile stability each family felt with the war’s upheaval and perhaps better than any other Christmas song evoked the underlying bond that Americans feel toward family unity and the focal point for this unity that is associated with Christmas.

     It has been performed many times since by hundreds of artists , including a special version by Frank Sinatra, but nothing comes close to Judy Garland and the vulnerable, beautiful and sentimental performance by her in Meet Me in St. Louis:

 

Its Going To Be A World of Hurt

     The staggering bill of our profligate spending of the last thirty years is progressively coming to bear not only on the national level, but on the state and municipal levels as well.  A recent study shows our state by state indebtedness is now approaching a trillion dollars and the ability to structure solid payment plans by state legislatures is steadily diminishing.  The Pew Center records that only four states are currently in a budgetary position to successfully fund their future pension and health care mandates and their position is rapidly slipping as well. 

     How did we get ourselves in this ridiculous mess?  The old fashioned way – spending without control for processes we had no intent on paying for through the current generation, assuming the growing economy would forever shield and cover our inability to spend within our means, and continuing to elect corrupted politicians who bought re-elections with the votes of monopolizing public employee unions secured with ever more gluttonous pension and healthcare benefits.

     The current national hero in the fight for fiscal sanity is the rotund pitbull governor of New Jersey Chris Christie who has been declared mean and a bully for simply stating the obvious- that New Jersey is out of money currently with an over 11 billion dollar current deficit and, spectacularly, out of future money with over 100 billion of unfunded mandates to public services and employee unions.  the bad news? – New Jersey is only one of many states in this situation of intolerable budget choices, and that the bill may come due as early as next summer.

    
This next summer is the time that many state and municipal bonds come due in states that are approaching default status.  It may well be that one of the most secure forms of investment by major banks may go the way of default similar to the loans related to the housing collapse of two years ago, leaving many banks highly vulnerable and over leveraged.  Can you say double dip recession?

     HotAir.com presents an important sixty minutes video that is worth the initial commercials and every bit of its extended view.  Hopefully the recent elections put enough adults in place that the day of reckoning does not come forth without an eventual day of salvation.