Dissecting the Arab Spring

     Powerline is an excellent blog of broad scope and terrific writing that serves an additional fundamental service to the readers and thinkers of the blogosphere.  It is the home of the unedited versions of Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson of the Hoover Institution who provides truly uncommon in-depth interviews with real experts and thinkers.  Of particular note is the discussion Peter has with Fouad Ajami, Johns Hopkins Professor of Middle East Studies and a senior Fellow of the Hoover Institute, and Charles Hill, Diplomat in Residence and lecture in Leadership studies at Yale University.  This fascinating discussion looks at Iraq, Afghanistan, philosophic tenets of Islamism, and the Arab Spring through the perspective of both intellectual study and the Arab street. It is an essential discussion as we as supporters of the ideal of personal liberty, self determination, and quantitative freedom review the forces at work over the last ten years and what the future may bring in terms of challenge and opportunity. Courtesy of Powerline, a must listen from end to end.



After America


The greatest short essayist in my lifetime comes out with another book on August 8, 2011 that is bound to be a blockbuster in sales and penetrating thought. Mark Steyn, an international columnist and thought provocateur previously identified as Ramparts People We Should Know #3 has made a career over the last two decades writing thousands of insightful essays on culture, entertainment, government, religion, liberties, and western ideals that are prodigious in number and unrivaled in clever phrasing, analysis, and introspection. Readers of National Review, Macleans, the Jerusalem Post, Atlantic Monthly and Orange County Register among others have had the constant pleasure of reading sentences and paragraphs from this terrific writer that express clarity, satire, punch, intelligence and comedy in equal measure.
Now 51 years old, Steyn has been an enfant terrible for decades, skewering the pompous, self-important, and dictatorial, eloquently speaking up for freedom of speech and personal liberties. His take no prisoners approach to writing has led to direct confrontation with political correctness and governmental censorship and has made him a hero to millions and a threat those who demand a righteous view of culture and events.

In 2008, Steyn wrote the international best seller America Alonein which he identified the deterioration in European cultural identity, collapsing judeo-christian values, and declining native birthrates, challenged by burgeoning  islamic immigrant populations and the unwillingness of those immigrants to assimilate into a western cultural identity. He noted the unique position of America as a country that still had a muscular economy based on entrepeneurism, a constitution preserving personal freedom, and a healthy birthrate of individuals that shared the goals of freedom and economic independence. His fear expressed in the book was that the loss of European cultural identity would leave America dangerously isolated and at risk to succumbing to the progressive growth of reactionary societies and lack of shared history.

     A few years later, with the stunning acceptance by the American public  of bank and automobile company bailouts, a pathway to personal health servitude relying upon government whim, calamitous spending habits, and governmental acceptance of unfunded debt at inconceivable levels has left Steyn considerably more pessimistic about America’s survival and therefore the survival of the western ideal.  The speed at which this turnabout in America’s fortunes and her society’s desire to resist the ebbing of her position as the world leader in progress and freedom has been simply at the level of a freefall.  I would suggest readers of the Ramparts would consider Mr. Steyn’s new book After America required reading and hopefully a sufficient prophecy of warning to help us all stop those who would continue to send us hurdling over a cliff.   The video below, courtesy of the blog American Power, is extensive but captures Steyn’s passion and intellect on the Canadian television show Sources.  Enjoy the discourse. Buy the book. Expand your mind. Enjoy a great writer.

The Slow Motion Train Wreck

   
The slow motion train wreck that was Amy Winehouse came to its inevitable conclusion with her reported death suspected from overdose in London at age 27 on July 23rd,2011.  She joins a notorious group of 27 year old modern recording artists that found the combination of overwhelming fame and fragile psyche too much to survive.  The brutal soup of music, nightlife, drugs and alcohol lies at the base of each tragic story and was no stranger to Amy Winehouse. 

     She came out of middle class mores from a jewish London family with a healthy exposure to jazz, Frank Sinatra, and 1960s soul and Motown performers that clashed with the rock trend youth culture of London.  Her family recognized very early in her life two countervailing traits, a soulful voice that hearkened back to the style of Aretha Franklin and Billy Holliday, and an incorrigible personality that led Amy to do whatever she wanted when she wanted.  Admitted to an artists school for advanced training she left early to seek her own way, and absorb any direction not associated with her parents.  She had an obvious gift to all that listened however, and in a music world of lip synched performances and musical conformity, her throw back style and prodigious voice stood out.  At age 19, her album Frank created a huge buzz and at 23 her followup Back To Black became a multi- Grammy award winning album and an international best seller.  She was identified as talent on par with the greats, and world wide adulation and concert dates awaited.

     No one bothered to see if Amy Winehouse was up to the pressure, and nothing in her personality suggested she was.  She performed at various times late, smashed, high, incoherent and rambling and with each successive year more obviously out of control.  Its difficult to identify a single performance where she wasn’t under the influence of mind altering agents, and the performance on the video below is no exception.  Her mother upon hearing of her death, stated “her death was only a matter of time”.  The complete absense of impulse control proved impossible for anyone in her family to intervene, and the progression from alcohol to heroin to crack cocaine to methylamphetamines proved, as it does in any case, a train wreck fullly predictable the moment it leaves the station.

     So why bother to review the life of a willing, self destructive, self hateful person?  It is really because of the power of musical talent to elevate that leads one to watch the train wreck unfold and hope against hope that it can be averted, that the artist can see with final clarity the gift they have, and can make full use of it to inspire.  The truth is, the rescue required is an illusory dream that neither those  family close enough nor the music appreciator should have any expectation to see to fruition.  The musical gene, as powerful as it is, is overwhelmed by the base animal instincts to self imbibe, self pleasure, and self destroy.

     Amy Winehouse may have been a star, but like so many others, she was just a shooting star.

Don’t Know Nothin’ ‘Bout History

     The Wall Street Journal today interviews noted American author and historian David McCullough about Americans’ understanding of history and the pathetic state of our educational process in understanding our culture’s origin and evolution. Mr. McCullough, noted Pulitzer prize winner author of biographies of Harry Truman and John Adams, as well as exceptional books on the Brooklyn Bridge, the fateful year of the American Revolution 1776, young Theodore Roosevelt, and narrator of the epic Ken Burns documentary, the Civil War, laments our atrocious collective ignorance of our past.  He points to several trends in Americans’ educational process that are at the root of our historical knowledge deficits. 

     The first is the trend toward political correctness in our description of history, placing insignificant figures at absurdly equal positions of relative prominence to our giants of history, in order to exaggerate the impact of their views which fit a modern skewed version of events and their consequences.  The second is the domination of educating teachers on educational process rather than subjects, so that the average teacher is frequently teaching subjects they no little or nothing about.   The third is the teaching of “victim” history, where the effect of historical events on an”oppressed” group results in the loss of perspective and particularly chronological reference in understanding the outcomes.  Last, he laments painfully boring, poorly written, and stupefyingly politically correct history textbooks that remove all suspense, mystery, and lessons learned from the study of history.  McCullough acknowledges the knowledge deficit has been foisted upon young people by a generation that lost interest in the common story of the American experience and preferred their own version of events.

     The loss of history as a cornerstone to modern western educational process is having devastating effects on our national discourse, problem solving, and vetting of our leaders.  The election of a leader based on their appearance, smooth delivery, and their social “awareness” rather than their grasp of the elements of this free society that have led it to greatness is a direct outcome of the voter who votes patterns rather than depth of understanding of issues.  This has brought us judges who don’t uphold laws that have been crafted from debate and democratic process, but rather on whether the law “fits” their sense of value. It has created politicians that predicate their survival on pandering, rather than their recognition of principle.  Most importantly, it diminishes the historical struggle of our past fellow citizens to fight for and put things right, at great risk to themselves, when the outcome was not assured.  The old dictum that those who forget history, are condemned to repeat its mistakes, implys the modern generation has learned any history to forget.

     Mr. McCullough is among a cherished group of progressive thinkers who realize our historical deficit threatens our unique culture and prosperity.  Alas, there are none too few of the ilk of David McCulloughs , and far too many who see history as just another example of western civilization’s arrogance toward other cultures.

     The only hope is an old fashioned one. Find a good book on history or civics, and pass it on.  Its possible you might convince another that there is something to this wonderful story of ours after all.

A Moveable Feast

     

          As part of a recent wonderful dinner with family and friends, the topic of Woody Allen’s new movie Midnight in Paris came up.  As an aside, I appreciate greatly the conversations that revolve around my family dinners.  They have always been the birthplace of wonderful memories and unique conversations that abound out of the great trough of creative experiences that has been our life cinema; the food, the wine, the places, and the people.  And so it was with this dinner.  Woody Allen has put forth a movie of time travel that interjects Owen Wilson into 1920’s Paris where he meets Hemingway and other characters of 1920’s Paris so artfully described in  Hemingway’s A Moveable FeastPutting aside Woody Allen’s need as an avowed modern liberal to somehow imply that the modern ugly American is a Republican Tea Party zealot, the movie is described as interposing the creative impulse of young Americans in Paris of the 1920’s that is the stuff of legend.
       Ernest Hemingway died in 1961, and his memoir, A Moveable Feastwas published posthumously in 1964, edited by his widow and forth wife, Mary Hemingway. Hemingway discovered in the late 1950’s a collection of notebooks he had left in a trunk at the Hotel Ritz in Paris. They were vignettes from the young Hemingway describing his experiences in Paris in the 1920’s with his first wife Hadley and their interactions with fellow expatriates Gertrude Stein, James Joyce, F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, and Ezra Pound. Hemingway crafted the memories into a book that was approaching a final draft when he died, and his publisher and wife determined to put it forward as one his published novels.
       The Paris of the 1920’s comes exuberantly alive in Hemingway’s novel. The description of the ancient narrow streets, the local characters, the food, the vibrant cafe nightlife, and the innate quality of life of post-war Paris are brought to us with the vivid clarity of a master painter. Hemingway recognized more importantly that his memories were not so much of 1920’s Paris as they were a memoir on youth, where 5 dollars a day brought fantastic experiences, struggling to make something of oneself an exciting adventure not a stressful burden, and a youthful power and vitality that layered each youthful interaction with a kaleidoscopic, vibrant palette. Hemingway acknowledged that time had cleansed the mundane and negative out of his projection of the time, stating “if the reader prefers, this book may be regarded as fiction.”
      Paris of the 1920s and 1930s is a kind of life that exists for us even though there are very few of us remaining that actually lived and experienced it. It is life exemplary, full of quality, adventure, civility, and living for the moment, that most of us can only dream of. Did it ever exist? Was it created by people like Hemingway and Fitzgerald to bring weight to their lifes in the eyes of others, to reflect back on their lives like they were characters in a movie?  Whether Hemingway found the truth of life by writng as he termed “truthful sentences“, or describing life as he would have preferred to have lived it, he has provided for us a missal on how life should be lived, all things considered, asserting life’s journey is forever to be savoured with each wonderful moment, great and small.
      I am going to go to Woody Allen’s movie, and I bet I will enjoy it, what ever the snarky little side messages. It will undoubtedly lead me , for probably the tenth time in my life, to break out and read one more time Hemingway’s little gem of a book, and acknowledge again how life lived,  is A Moveable Feast.

A Presidential Campaign, Russian Style

     The United States is about to go into that season of political discourse and verbal combat known as the presidential election process. It seems the previous election is barely over and the next crop of presidential wannabes start lining up and creating distinction between themselves and the person in power. The process has produced coronations, like the second term elections of President Nixon and Reagan, surprise political savants appearing out of nowhere like Presidents Carter, Clinton, and Obama, politicians thrust into the role like Truman and Johnson, and can’t miss politicians that missed, like Senators Muskie, Glenn, and Teddy Kennedy. The journey to the election, no matter how unsatisfying the result, is a grinding battle that takes place in the harsh spotlight of an intense press, the need for voluminous sums of investors, and the capacity to weather rhetorical storms.
       In an important article in the National Review, Paul Gregory gives definitive insight to a much different presidential process, the byzantine, behind the scene struggles of the men who would lead Russia. The election of 2012 is rapidly approaching, and unlike the American version, the battle to determine the winner will take long before the official vote. The epic battle brewing between the former president and current prime minister Vladimir Putin, and the man he chose to replace him, Dmitry Medvedev, is every bit as compelling as the American version, though much of the contest will be shielded from the public eye.
Democracy in the Russian Federation is an evolving concept with no deep historical roots. 400 years of totalitarian Tsarist rule of the Russian empire was disturbed only by the brief blip of the Russian Provisional Government that wobbled out of the upheaval known as the 1917 Russian Revolution, comulnating in the  overthrow of czar Nicholas II. The country barely looked up to see the czar gone, only to be thrust back into civil conflict and the rise of the communists, with 70 years of totalitarian oppression by  communist overloads and demigods like Lenin and Stalin, and a whole host of other unsavory politicos.  The final nail in the totalitarian coffin was driven by the shaky leadership of Mikael Gorbachev, whose glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) concepts to evolve a more humane communism only hastened its collapse by exposure of its fundamental failings, hypocrisies, and conceits.  The whole Potemkin village edifice of a functioning superpower economy came crashing down in 1989 with loss of the vassal states of eastern Europe, and the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union itself. 

      The first direct election for a President in history in 1991, brought a reform minded ex-communist to power, Boriis Yeltsin, who presided the next 8 years over a wild west atmosphere in Russia complete with “shock therapy” capitalism, oligarchy formation of major Russian industries, rampant economic strain, and nasty, bitter regional conflicts such as Chechnya, in provinces that did not achieve separation when the Soviet Union dissolved.  Fragile political parties developed in this period stood no chance surviving the upheaval and the population craved the steadier times provided by autocratic rule.  Yeltsin was replaced by Vladimir Putin, and the conversion of the early seedlings of healthy democracy, a vigorous press, multiple parties, and an independent judiciary, were rapidly silenced.  Stabilization of the Russian economy through weak currency and strong oil exports have rebuilt the Russian veneer of a strong stable central government, but the price has been steep with Putin permitting increasing corruption among supporters, devastating attacks on opponents, and heavy handed governmental tactics that remind many of the closed economy and political apparatchiks of earlier times.   With Putin’s two terms completed in 2008 and his desire to maintain the appearance of respecting the Russian constitution while maintaining power, he appointed himself prime minister and positioned Dmitry Medvedev, a technocrat, to succeed him as President.  I suspect the plan was Medvedev to play caretaker until Putin was free to resume the presidency after the necessary interval of four years. 

     The best laid plans often fail to predict all contigencies, and Putin clearly failed to see how Dmitry Medvedev would grow into the role of president.   He has proven himself competent on the international stage, more engaging then the brutish Putin with other leaders, and inherently more trustworthy.  Surprisingly, his calm, rational demeanor has proven a modern alternative to Putin’s egocentric superman persona, and the russians are beginning to view him as a compelling alternative to the godfather approach of Putin.  As Paul Gregory points out in his terrific article, the secret in Russia is to pick the winner correctly if one wants to prosper, and a surprising number of Russian politicos are hedging their bets.  What will occur over the next year is anybody’s guess, but it is not difficult to see the continuing split personality of the Russia that wants to be modern, and the Russia that wants to be dominant.  Time will tell if the country with its endless resources, will finally grasp its potential and take advantage of its diverse capacities. Putin vs Medvedev, is a heavyweight fight for the future of Russia. The best Presidential debate with the most impact on the battle of free will versus security, may yet be fought in 2012 on a foreign shore.

The Defining Moment

     The past ten years have brought this world an unbending line of overtly serious and at times tragic moments.  America, the last country on earth where it was okay to poke fun at our leaders and ourselves, seemed to have fallen into a world wide morose habit of whispering our thoughts to avoid potential offense.  After all, this is the decade of the nuclear menace of Iran and North Korea, the tragedy of 9/11 and the menace of world wide terrorism, the impending destruction of all life due to global warming, the collapse of trust in financial institutions world wide, the impending crisis of suffocating national debt, the never ending wars, the lack of identifiable common sense leadership….on and on…..Gees!

      Where has our wit gone, the salvation of all hard times?  The ability to laugh at ourselves and our foibles has been a American tradition with unbroken lineage from Mark Twain to Will Rodgers to Johnny Carson’s nightly take.   It seems that the information age has distorted our shared capacity to laugh at our own seriousness regardless of the source of the joke or the direction of its arrow.  The politics of correctness have made casualness and levity politically incorrect and risky.  The results are that the satire has become hurtful and stupid, rather than satirical and insightful.

     Well, maybe except for John Stewart.  Stewart’s show on Comedy Central unfailingly gets to the heart of societal humor and does not let its obvious political bias get in the way of good satire.  John Stewart let’s the cards fall where they may, and maybe single handedly rescuing humor from the politocrats who have taken their transient position in the public eye way too seriously.   Take a moment to appreciate the hundred directions of Stewart’s skewering of the pundits that prop up the myth of this particular President’s “seminal” place in history.  I don’t know if this President and this time in history is the Defining Moment of our times, but I do know John Stewart is an old fashioned American comedian in the best traditions of who we have always been, the society that understands ourselves and our journey, through our laughter.

Full Circle

     A manner of justice was served to a particularly odious terrorist in a upscale city in Pakistan early Monday morning local time. He will have no name in this blog, because his identity is known and he does not deserve a memorial of a Google search even to this remote, back- water blog. He found his termination as a deliverer of death at the hands of the country to whom his inflated position as a dark angel of indiscriminate terror had been etched by the inane savagery of thousands of innocent deaths on the morning of September 11th, 2001. The end was swift and sure; but it could not remotely equal the sustained horror of those trapped behind smoking floors of a soon to collapse skyscraper, the crushing agony of those who had to sit helpless as maniacal puppets of this terrorist drove planes into catastrophic impacts, and not even a wisp of the piercing pain that any mother of any slain soldier assassinated by a remote directed explosive must have felt when told the news of her beloved child’s end defending the very people this societal lynch artist claimed to represent.

     Who was this individual who became one of the most hunted figures in history? In final essence, he was a cartoon character of a man. A rich man who sold himself as some bizarre representative of the downtrodden. A faux religious character who pretended to live a life mirroring his prophet , when his personal own true religion was a sadistic worship of nihilism. A classic mass murder who hid behind a strategy of “mass casualty” as a cleaned up description of his need to kill the innocent in droves. A man proselytizing about the “foreign devil”, when he personally was responsible for more deaths among his own race and religion than any foreign influence or action could ever achieve.

     The full circle took ten years and it ended as suddenly and as swiftly as it began, from the air in ships, striking the seemingly impregnable, and laying waste in just minutes. The lessons will potentially take many more years to fully discern, but a frontier justice to deal with the truly wicked has found a 21st century role. There is no place in a modern civilized society for an evil that hides behind its projection of fear, that works toward the creation of a racialist, segregationist false choice between individual freedom and 7th century religious fervor and societal tenets. In the end the spark that this nihilist had ignited ended up with an arab world rising up not for a modern Caliph, but with this spring, a birth of potential freedom from tyranny. Through his own destruction, the faint candle that he tried over so many years to snuff out, may finally be in a position to illuminate. The ultimate irony.  The ultimate epitaph.

     Now that’s justice…

Celebrating the Bard

     In the non-descript river town in south central England known as Stratford-on-Avon, in the last week of April, 1564, the modern English language was born.  Prior to the event of birth occurring at John Shakespeare’s house at or about April 23rd, the language known as English had developed from the ground up on the backs of many influences. An initial germanic invasion of the Angles into the Northumbria region had impacted directly into the polyglot of dialects derived from the native Celtic and Saxon tribes and the 400 year influence of the Roman colonizers’ Latin creating a distinct language base known as Old English. Though not used as an administrative language, Old English found itself roots in literature most prominently displayed through the epic poem Beowulf.  The invasion of the french Normans led by William the Conqueror in 1066 brought a ruling class of Gauls speaking predominently a French dialect, and the romance language inflection converted the pre-existing language of commonality into a new dialect known as Middle English.  Its literature champion was Chaucer in the Canterbury Tales.  To this point Britain was an island under constant threat of invasion and domination from warrior classes as diverse as the Germans, the Vikings, the Romans, and the Normans and each wave bent the language curve again and again, until it lay passive in wait for the spark that would create a distinctly English culture.

    The spark required two pieces of kindle.  The first was the Tudor queen Elisabeth I, who presided over Britain from 1558 until her death in 1603, marshaling in a permanently outward reflection of British influence through her defeat of the invading Spanish Armada in 1588, creating a British power progressively on par with continental powers, and assuring a unique English culture through her establishment of a state protestantism that evolved into the Church of England, and encouraging local dialects in administrative actions of the state.  The second was the birth in Stratford-on-Avon of John Shakespeare’s son, William, who in his life of 52 years secured the language vehicle of modern English for all time as the language of art, poetry, history, and unity of a people.

     The Bard of Avon was so spectacular in his talent for bring voice to a new, modern English that historians have fought for centuries as to whether a son of a glover and a farmer’s daughter, educated in local schools, could have possibly been the creative force behind the enormity of the masterwork he articulated. Shakespeare had basic grounding in grammar and the classics, but a keen ear for the lyrical tradition of the bard, the muse who memorized the ancient epic stories of ancient people who inhabited Albion and help create a distinct culture. He worked first as an actor with a local troop then as actor and playwright for an actor’s company, the King’s Men, at the Globe in London. His initial impact was not historical, but visceral, as the first mentions of Shakespeare in London are by “educated” critics who felt he was writing plays above his “station” in life. Obviously the popularity of the plays was a driving force in getting elites to take notice. The very existence of criticism indicates a developing sense of a “right way and wrong way” to display a nation’s culture, the initial recognition of nationhood and national identity.at time when few were literate and printing presses few, the risk of Shakespeare’s brilliance to be swallowed whole by time was great, but thankfully, 8 years after his death, two compatriots of Shakespeare’s with his acting company achieved the publishing of all but two of his known works as the First Folio, and western civilization was given one of its all time creative jewels.

     A brief salute to the Bard on his birthday has no hope of forging a worthy dissertation of his genius.  It is enough to say the English language and culture and its immense effect on western civilization was due in no small part by William Shakespeare’s gift for word and drama.  His evolution from historical plays and poetic sonnets into the magisterial tragedies that created for the first time an audience’s window into the psychic and very human forces that drive thought and action have no cumulative equal in his language.  From comedy to epic history to romance to tragedy, the unbroken line is of an ever more human voice that elevates and personifies life, death, and man’s own recognition of individuality.  Over 400 years from their origin, the phrases and lyricism seem as fresh and meaningful today as upon their introduction to the English language.  The words as expressed by Shakespeare forever cemented a reason for an English language and their universality explain much as to the dominance of English as a global language today.

      On the 447th anniversary of the great Bard’s birth, let’s again celebrate the genius of his words, and one of the prime examples of western civilization’s greatest gifts to mankind, the freedom of the individual to develop his unique talents in his own unique voice, no matter his “station” in life.

All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His acts being seven ages. At first the infant,
Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms.
And then the whining school-boy, with his satchel
And shining morning face, creeping like snail
Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad
Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths and bearded like the pard,
Jealous in honour, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Seeking the bubble reputation
Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice,
In fair round belly with good capon lined,
With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,
Full of wise saws and modern instances;
And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts
Into the lean and slipper’d pantaloon,
With spectacles on nose and pouch on side,
His youthful hose, well saved, a world too wide
For his shrunk shank; and his big manly voice,
Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all,
That ends this strange eventful history,
Is second childishness and mere oblivion,
Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything

                                                                                                         William Shakespeare – As You Like It

To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action. - Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins remember'd.

                                        William Shakespeare – Hamlet


     Happy Birthday, Bard of Avon. 

And Now For Something Completely Different…

     President Obama determined today at a press conference to finally release his long form birth certificate, in order to end what he termed the “sideshow”, and declaring, “We do not have time for this silliness. We’ve got better stuff to do.”  Better stuff to do, indeed.  Putting aside the president’s motives in withholding the certificate for over three years after his birthplace was initially questioned by the Hillary Clinton forces in the democratic primaries of 2008, the announcement clearly puts to rest for the time being the quisentential American time honored tradition of the Conspiracy Theory. The rupturing of the “birtherism” conspiracy leaves of course all the other wonderful residual conspiracy theories attached to this mystery of a man – who got Obama into Columbia and Harvard University – who really wrote Obama’s “autobiography” – what really is the religion that Obama professes as his faith – that will take us right up through the next election cycle, and will continue to deflect from what the President refers to as “better stuff”. Conspiracy theories live in the world of incomplete information, and this President, who promised to be the most open in history, has been the master of the tabula rasa.
   

       The historical expanse of American Conspiracy Theories projects back to the founding of the republic and is driven by the assumption that successful entities achieved their success not through hard work but a vehicle not available to the “average Joe”. President Obama himself daily participates in such yarns when he implies the “rich” are not “paying their fair share” as a tribute of their “bounty”, that the oil companies are “price gauging” every time the price of gasoline reaches painful levels, or that reform of medicare will preferentially harm the “aged” and the “disabled”. The conspiracy theories with the most staying power are usually the most obtuse and bizarre, and often involve the government. Take for instance the 9/11 Truther conspiracy that claims the United States government destroyed the World Trade Center either by “allowing” it to happen or even physically directing the planes to strike pre-armed sections of the towers. This theory builds upon the historical trellis of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s supposed pre-knowledge of the Japanese Pearl Harbor Attack December 7th, 1941, again, “allowing” it to happen to draw us into war. Both scenarios draw on the inadequate intelligence information available to the Presidents Bush and Roosevelt that supposes that the destiny of the event was clear to all, but ignored for nefarious means. A different kind of government conspiracy is the public health menace in which “experts” seek to control the population, such as the US creating AIDS and releasing it from a lab, or the placement of Fluoride in water not to reduce tooth decay, but to poison people. Insidious conspiracy theories based on racialist notions have induced great harm, such as the conspiracy of Jewish world domination, or the western world’s response to 9/11 as a device to corral the world’s oil supply from Arabs or a return of the Crusades, inflaming the Arab street. Another venue is the small group knowing elites controlling the world, such as the Tri-Lateral Commission, the “New World Order”, or earlier the Masons.  The list goes on, and on, and on.

     We are, in short, a nation full of suspicions and rationalizations of what effects history and events, and we are not soon to be cured of this affliction.  The best device for controlling the conversation and focusing the people on the hard work and challenges inherent in conquering large problems is a willingness to be open and upfront about the small distractions.  The president in his dribbling out of information only enhances those who would assume an irrational explanation for their concerns about his decision making.  As the president says, it is time to put away such silliness, and focus on what is the true conspiracy of this presidency, the willingness to talk about our difficult times as an adult, yet act upon potential solutions with the avoidance and disdain of a distracted child.